Friday, May 30, 2014

The New Spice Route (and the Role of America)

After the Second World War, the United States was the unrivaled leader of the "free world", with only the economically unstable Soviet Union offering a counter-balance to US global hegemony.

As the post-Soviet world begins to reshape into a  multi-polar world order, with China and the EU as the new main participants, control over the New Spice Route is going to become a continuing theme in global affairs. 

The most existential threat to global economic growth in 2014 is concerns about the global trade in hydrocarbons. Some of the worlds most important economies, and largest contributors to global growth rely on imports of hydrocarbons to fuel their growing economies. This is the great challenge to Asia especially as many Asian nations have very limited domestic supplies of oil and gas.

The existential crisis is most prevalent for Japan, following the Fukushima-Daichi nuclear plant disaster. Much of the Japanese Economic Miracle of the 1970s-1990 is due to relatively low cost of inputs from one of the world's largest systems of nuclear power. Following Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda's decision to wind-down Japan's aging nuclear power plants, Japan has been spending large amounts importing oil and gas, specifically from the Middle East. This is putting pressure on global oil prices and making Japan's exports less competitive. 

Japan is an example to other Asian nations, like South Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam and Malaysia, as to the importance of the global hydrocarbon trade and the dangers of Chinese militarism in the South China Sea. Essentially, for these nations, if China is able to displace American naval superiority in the South and East China Seas, then they will be completely dependent on China, and face a crisis as China would have the ability to stop economic activity in the Asia-Pacific with an oil embargo.

As much as two-thirds of global trade flows through the Strait of Malacca and is managed through the major international ports of Kuala Lumpur and Singapore. This is trade from Asia bound for European consumers and Middle Eastern hydrocarbons headed toward energy-starved Asian nations.

Control of the Strait, as well as the Adaman Sea and the South China Sea is key for globalization to continue in the 21st century.

This is the most important global pinch-point and a geo-strategic imperative for the United States to ensure remains free to global trade. However, recent discoveries of hydrocarbon fields off-shore in the sea have led to a scramble to harvest those resources. Malaysia, Vietnam, Phillipines and China all claim ownership of the resource rights in the South China Sea. China (not shown on map) claims the entire South China Sea and this will be a cauldron of diplomacy in the coming decades. US and European engagement is necessary to counter-balance Chinese growth and protect the economic interests in the region.

The New Pharaohs 

The second strategically volatile region for global trade is the Red Sea. An overlooked concern of the Arab Spring and the overthrow of President Hosni Mubarak in 2011 was the Suez Canal. While the West received some guarantees from the Egyptian military that access to the canal would be maintained, this remains an concern for global trade as political uncertainty remains.

The Red Sea contains two main choke points, the first at the Suez Canal, the second at the Gulf of Aden. Currently, the Gulf of Aden is the most insecure area to navigate on the New Spice Route. Regional instability in Yemen, Sudan, Eritrea and the failed state of Somalia make this a difficult area of influence for the United States and European allies. This is an area the Global War on Terror has destabilized even further. Adding to the complexity is the question of nuclear negotiations with Iran and the concern in the Persian Gulf and specifically the strategically important Strait of Hormuz. 

As the center of the global hydrocarbon trade, the Arabian Kings in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE and Oman will continue to wield outsized influence and will become a more important military power in the 21st century as the war-weary United States winds down engagements in the region post-Iraq War.

It would be the expectation that US military-industrial complex will be investing heavily with American regional allies on the peninsula, and that the US Congress will allow a larger amount of arm sales to produce a counterweight to Iran, as well as allow for more domestic counter-terrorism activities.

Maintaining the Balance in the Mediterranean


The final leg of the New Spice Route is Europe's backyard. The Mediterranean is a region traditionally controlled by European powers. While the Strait of Gibraltar is the most secure pinch point in global trade, recent Russian movements have changed the dynamics of the sea and created a geopolitical crisis as Russia's annexation of Crimea can be seen as a threat to the West as it grants the Russians broader access to the Mediterranean basin and the ability to disrupt global trade in any future conflict.

This is where the Crisis in Ukraine extends to become a geo-strategic concern. Incorporating Crimea and the Port of Sevastopol into the Russian Federation grants Russian de facto control of the Black Sea. This creates challenges for NATO, as Turkey is a linchpin of that alliance, and this starts a balance of power situation for the region.

As Turkey continues is economic rise, it may seek broader assurances for its security by acting alone. Turkey faces many challenges on its Eastern flank as nationalist Kurds look to form a state in Northern Iraq and Syria. This is a domestic political concern for Turkey, home to 14 million Kurds.

Turkey also faces a refugee crisis as the Syrian Civil War extends into its third year. Add al Qaeda-linked organizations like Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and continuing unrest in the Levant, and Turkey becomes a more vital ally to the West in the new world order. Not only as a counter-balance to Russia, as it was during the Cold War, but also as a barrier to radical militants in the Middle East en route to Europe.

Overall, this bodes well for the continuation of American economic and political might in the 21st century.


Friday, June 28, 2013

Historical movies in chronical order



Quest for Fire
The Ten Commandments
Troy
The Odyssey
Alexander
Spartacus
Rome
Empire
The Passion of the Christ
Ben-Hur
Nero
Gladiator
Augustine: The Decline of the Roman Empire
Ancient Rome: The Rise and Fall of an Empire
Curse of he Golden Flower
Macbeth
Kingdom of Heaven
Robin Hood
The Name of the Rose
Joan of Arc
Braveheart
The Conclave
Mongol
Marco Polo
Conquest 1453
1492: Conquest of Paradise
The Borgias
The Tudors
The Other Boleyn Girl
Apocalypto
Elizabeth
Elizabeth: The Golden Age
The Merchant of Venice
Shōgun
The New World
The Devil's Whore
Charles II: The Power and The Passion
The Red Violin
Rob Roy
Roots
Marie Antoinette
Amadeus
The Last of the Mohicans
Brotherhood of the Wolf
The Duchess
The Patriot
Marie Antoinette
Farewell, My Queen
The Madness of King George
Vanity Fair
Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World
War and Peace
Amazing Grace
Les Misérables
The Count of Monte Cristo
The Alamo
The Young Victoria
Mrs. Brown
Amistad
Gangs of New York
The Charge of the Light Brigade
Ride with the Devil
12 Years A Slave
Gone with the Wind
Glory
Gettysburg
Cold Mountain
Lincoln
Wyatt Earp
Dances with Wolves
Anna and the King
Deadwood
The Last Samurai
The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford
Tombstone
Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid
Gandhi
1911
Meet Me in St. Louis
The Battleship Potemkin
Titanic
Doctor Zhivago
Ararat
All Quiet On The Western Front
Joyeux Noel
Flyboys
Gallipoli
A Very Long Engagement
Lawrence of Arabia
Michael Collins
The Lost Battalion
Kundun
The Last Emperor
The Wind that Shakes the Barley
Chariots of Fire
Evita
Legionnaire
The King's Speech
Casablanca
Australia
Road to Perdition
The Flowers of War
Schindler's List
The Pianist
Tora! Tora! Tora!
The Pacific
The Bridge on the River Kwai
The Thin Red Line
Empire of the Sun
Letters from Iwo Jima
Paradise Road
Band of Brothers
Enemy at the Gates
The Imitation Game
Patton
The Longest Day
Saving Private Ryan
Valkyrie
A Bridge Too Far
Flags of Our Fathers
Letters from Iwo Jima
Downfall
Nuremberg
Fat Man and Little Boy
Emperor
Seven Years in Tibet
The Reader
The Godfather
LA Confidential
The Shawshank Redemption
The Good Shepherd
The Right Stuff
Good Night, and Good Luck
Che
The Motorcycle Diaries
Quiz Show
JFK
The Godfather: Part II
J. Edgar
Thirteen Days
Ghosts of Mississippi
Mississippi Burning
We Were Soldiers
The Doors
Platoon
The Deer Hunter
Full Metal Jacket
Apocalypse Now
Born on the Fourth of July
The Deer Hunter
Bobby
Nixon
Apollo 13
All the President's Men
Goodfellas
Zodiac
Taxi Driver
Milk
The Last King of Scotland
Munich
Balibo
Frost/Nixon
Summer of Sam
Goodbye Bafana
Catch a Fire
Argo
Charlie Wilson's War
Jarhead
Three Kings
Black Hawk Down
Hotel Rwanda
Invictus
Behind Enemy Lines
Blood Diamond
The Queen
W.
Lions for Lambs
The Hurt Locker
The Social Network
Green Zone
Too Big to Fail
Margin Call
Zero Dark Thirty

Friday, June 7, 2013

Dangers of Japan's monetary policy

In 2012, with the election of Shinzo Abe, Japan embarked on a policy of bond buying which has subsequently taken the dollar-yen back to 95 , it's highest point since the financial crisis started. This is great for Japanese exporters because it makes their exports more competitive and also exerts real wage depreciation on workers, which helps the long-term competitiveness of the country.

The downside to this policy is that Japan is already in a liquidity trap. Demand for money is very low despite interest rates that are touching -(1.5)%. This is creating a temporary bubble in the TSE as hot money starts flowing into the yen to take advantage of the inflationary bull market. The challenge is that as the hot money flows into Japan, the yen rises, making the central bank's bond buying harder and harder to stay ahead of to achieve their desired goal.


The liquidity trap is really dangerous - something Europe may soon learn (the Netherlands specifically). No matter how low interest rates go, the economic engine won't turn over. This is why the easing program that Shinzo Abe has announced is being well received - even if it is 20 years too late to have a real impact.

Japan's real problem is that they have no domestic growth and their exports are being commoditized by other Asian countries like Korea, Taiwan, China, Indonesia and even Malaysia. The question is: without monetary trickery where is growth going to come from?

Japan has a population expected to decline by as many as 50 million people by the end of the century; they have very limited natural resources, which combined with the current anti-nuclear push has created higher production costs for Japanese manufacturers; and they have a "ingenuity gap" as US tech companies continue to dominate the Internet and Korean and Chinese manufacturers handle the gadget manufacturing.

Today the Tokyo Stock Exchange entered into bear market territory, down 10% from it's recent peak. This monetary alchemy needs to stop or else the yen risks a real collapse into an unstoppable deflationary spiral with inflation. This is stagflation 2.0 and could do a lot to derail the good economic news coming out of the US. Trade with caution.

Monday, June 3, 2013

The state of the Republican Party

The most common adjectives to describe today's Republican Party include: obstructionist, anti-women, anti-gay, anti-immigrant or pro-gun. These are not the adjectives that will win seats in the 2014 mid-terms or the 2016 presidential race.

The Republican Party badly needs to change its messaging away from demagoguery towards something inspirational for the country to grasp. As the economist noted in last weeks newspaper, Gen Y is a neo-liberal group encouraged by the values of the Internet: freedom, liberty, anti-statist. I think this is a great opportunity the Republicans. 

The Republicans have lost the culture wars; religiosity is now a net negative to the party. In the mid-1990s it was a way to consolidate the base, but now that base, in form of the Tea Party Caucus is pulling the party in two. The disappointment to many is that Tea Party Caucus economic values are actually mainstream among Gen Y. The idea that the government should regulate and supervise business and protect the environment and otherwise stay out of the private sector economy is a vision that can be easy to grasp. Gen Y is also very much skeptical of the welfare state. The challenge is that the Tea Party Caucus vision for a neo-liberal economic model is blunted by their statist religiousness. If they could advocate freedom of choice, freedom of beliefs and advocate for more state-based decision-making they could have a winning message.

The Republicans also need to avoid their current pattern of disingenuousness. Rolling out Ann Romney to boost her husbands' fortunes with women came of as pandering. After losing the 2012 election, the Republicans have now decided that Latino voters are am important demographic for them. They have now been trotting out Marco Rubio in a blatant attempt to look, not pro-Latino, but at least not anti-Latino. It all has a false feeling to it. Like selecting Michael Steele as the RNC chairman after 2008 to show the Republicans were progressive on civil rights after Obama's victory. The American people know when they are being lied to and when politicians are being disingenuous.

Chris Christie is truly a model for the future of the Republican Party. While he may not make a great presidential candidate, he can be the ideological guide to the party. He has some good ideas: put money in classrooms rather that teacher's unions, ensure the government has no structural deficits by engaging in entitlement reform, invest in infrastructure, etc. Those are very centrist opinions, and Christie has been very shy when wading into any culture war arenas.

Michelle Bachmann is now gone as the philosophical leader of the Tea Party Caucus, Sarah Palin's anti-intelligence dogma has been silenced in the main steam. This is an important opportunity for the Republicans to go away, come up with a platform and a framework for the country that can inspire.

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

America 2050: Economic Action Plan

Preamble:
From the current discourse in Washington, DC it is important to identify the key components that are required to ensure a timely deleveraging of liabilities while ensuring that the federal, state and local governments continue to prosper. The United States of America was founded on the values of Thomas Jefferson and our Founding Fathers: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. To ensure these values and the free market ideals that they espouse continue in the 21st century, the United States Congress is requested to act on the following Provisions of the America 2050: Economic Action Plan.

i) Reconstruct the Federal Tax Code:
Federal income levels commensurate to tax rate:
<$30,000 - 5%
$30,001-45000 - 10%
$45,001-58,000 - 13.5%
$58,001-75,000 - 15%
$75,001-150,000 - 20%
$150,001-250,000 - 25%
>$250,000 - 35%
Family (joint income) rate reduction of 2.5%, with children 5%.
Mortgage interest deduction: Up to $5000/year reduction in taxable earnings.

Federal business income:
20%
Capital expense carry-forward tax credit of up to 10 years.
New hire carry-forward tax credit of up to 2 years.
R&D carry-forward tax credit of up to 5 years.

ii) Educate America 2035
Convert 40% of US public schools to charter schools by 2025.

Teach America program to retrain teachers and educators to: update skills in maths, sciences and technology; learn modern classroom management skills.
Limit school size to 1500 by 2020 through new construction and modernization efforts.
Provide $100 billion for state-level post-secondary education.
Require successful completion of course for eligibility of government student loans.

iii) Train America 2030

Create New Millenium Skills Program for adults 25 and older to enroll in government run computer skills, word processing, Internet and smartphone courses.
Provide $15 billion in direct funding for results-based student loans for courses/programs at accredited post-secondary institutions.

iv) Reform Welfare and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
Limit receipt of welfare to 2 years before requiring skills training or public service.
SNAP available to individuals with income <$24,000 or families <$29,000

v) Medicaid eligibility
Individuals w/ income <$24,000 or families <$29,000

vi) Social Security
Means test benefits for individuals with eligible income >$65,000, and couples >$80,000 for Citizens younger than 55 (2012).

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

The World in 2014

The world in 2014 will be a more volatile and dangerous place. 
Following the 2007-2008 financial crisis in the United States, the global economy has suffered a lingering credit crisis. The impact of the destruction of trillions of dollars in global wealth has shaken financial institutions and governments. The cascade from the financial crisis on European economies was immediate, but not realized until 2010 when European banks began to struggle under the weight of their own property investment excesses. Unfortunately, their banks were too big to fail, and also too big to bailout, especially in the Eurozone periphery. The weight of the failing banks is destroying the public finances of these countries as the investment excesses of a few are effectively nationalized under undemocratic anti-progressive terms.
This essentially takes us to today, June 2012. The Eurozone is fracturing as debt-burdened periphery countries (Ireland, Greece, Portugal, Spain) are relying more and more on the core (Germany, France) to keep their banks and governments afloat. Greece has already accepted a government bailout under the most draconian of terms, Spain required €100 billion to keep its banks capitalized and will likely need a national bailout as well. Nouriel Roubini's "slow motion train wreck".
The Euro Crisis is extremely dangerous to the world economy as Europe is a lynchpin in global credit markets. Eventually "too big to bailout" will mean something and the ripples through the EU, and the global economy would likely perpetuate a recession worse than 2008-2009.
The EU is easily China's largest trading partner. Chinese exports to the EU were $356 billion ($324 billion to the US) in 2011. Imports from the EU at $211 billion almost double the US. This means that EU troubles are Chinese troubles and Chinese troubles affect global commodity prices and have spill over to Japan, Indonesia, South Korea, Brazil and Australia. This will also create conditions for a likely US recession.
All of this financial turbulence will lead to greater instability around the world. As the primary exporter of natural gas to Europe, Russia will face a dangerous situation of lower medium-term commodity prices. Already facing political challenges, Vladimir Putin, Russia's president/prime minister, will likely see that challenge increase as state coffers struggle to keep job growth. Similar political challenges might face Saudi Arabia, which already had to grant $150 billion in social programs to skirt out out of the Arab Spring. Saudi Arabia will likely survive politically, as they have $500+ billion in currency reserves available to appease the population. Countries like Nigeria, Argentina, Peru and Venezuela all face similar political problems in a low-price energy environment. All of this means greater uncertainty in the world economy that had so much promise at the turn of the new millenium.
In 2014, we are likely to see a world that become more fractured. While the neo-liberal agenda of free trade and globalization will continue, the benefits will be harder to see. City-states like Singapore and Hong Kong are likely to benefit as safe harbors. Fiscal pressures will continue to mount for developed economies as negligible growth will hurt tax revenues and aging populations will increase the burdens on the state. Massive pension and health care funding shortfalls exist in all developed countries and this will exacerbate an already precarious situation. This might even create political tension in the United States as Congress becomes forced to address fiscal challenges in 2013-2014. Although likely to become a beneficiary of a flight to quality, the US cannot continue to run trillion dollar deficits forever, even at 0.5% interest rates. All of this culminates in a very precarious world in 2014 which will likely continue until the end of the decade.

Monday, June 4, 2012

A tale of two Europes

Taking the EU debt crisis back to the Carolingian Renaissance in the late 8th century might be a bit of a stretch, but it is the beginning of France and the Holy Roman Empire, that would (a millenium later) become modern Germany. Throughout the centuries, this European division has been associated with a class of cultures as northern Europe struggled to take up the mantle from the Roman Empire.

Today's crisis harkens back to this era, but more noticeably to the Protestant Reformation and the development of an Anglo-Saxon model of economics. The Catholic countries of Europe (France, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Ireland), have always favored more state control in their daily lives. Much of this comes from the consecration of kings by the Vicar of Rome, ad the familial nature of the Catholic faith.

It is argued that Protestants, beginning with Martin Luther had reconceptualised worldly work as a duty which benefits both the individual and society as a whole. Thus, the Catholic idea of good works was transformed into an obligation to work diligently as a sign of grace. Whereas Catholicism teaches that good works are required of Catholics to be saved (viewing salvation as a future event), the Reformers taught that good works were only a consequence of an already-received salvation.

This Schism in faith continues to be articulated in modern Europe today. The Protestant work ethic is evident in Germany, whereas the Catholic nations of the south continue to have expectations that the state will be there to bail them out. In Portugal, Spain and Italy, their modern economies are vastly underdeveloped. They lag their economic peers by almost two decades in terms of labor efficiencies, tax policy and economic creativity. This is leaving an economy like Spain operating at almost 20% below nominal GDP. Because the government has controls on competition and over regulates industries to favor guilds and unions (many of which date back centuries). Southern European consumers are vastly underprivileged in terms of service supplied. An example would be a pharmacy, where compared to 24hr drug stores in the US and UK, France and Italy have a heavily regulated industry where even during business hours it can be difficult to get a prescription filled.

What does this mean for Europe and the Euro?

Germany is going to be the engine of Europe for the foreseeable future, and it is developing an neo-mercantilist relationship with its EU neighbors as low-value add processes take place in the periphery, whereas high value add jobs are done in Germany. This is the difference between bottling olive oil versus machining a precision tool for robotics. One economy is stuck in the 14th century, whereas Germany is competing directly with Japan, the US for command of the 21st (China will join that list in the 2030s).

The world should favor the Euro because it has created an economic union that rivals the US and China in size (the EU is already the largest economy). The challenges are now political, but PIGS needs to recognize, that it is better to be a vassal state of Germany's economic empire than to go it alone in a globalized world.